Safety Culture Ladder

In our market consultation we have encountered several methods. Unfortunately, these methods were mostly based on only performing a self-assessment. The beauty of the SCL system is that it is a comprehensive system. A transparent assessment system has been developed, the audits are carried out by accredited audit organizations (objective and non-discriminatory) and it also offers a development perspective, it is a growth model. TenneT is a contracting authority, which means that we have to make our purchases by obeying the principles of transparency, objectivity and non-discriminatory. The SCL system fulfils these requirements, which allows TenneT to use the SCL as a purchasing tool. TenneT is also open for alternative methods, as long as they fit, in general terms, the same principles as the SCL. An important element is that the alternative method should be audit based.

Actually we did not receive any of such signals. Many suppliers appreciated that TenneT is working on SCL certification as well. Next to that we started a pilot project together with four of our suppliers (two Dutch based and two German based), to learn about the SCL standard itself and the process of getting certified. We also think that many of our suppliers saw the potential of the SCL certification for their own organisation, and approached our initiative positively.

We also do think that cultural change is not fixed overnight. However, it are the day to day actions that ultimately make a culture. A strong point of SCL certification is that a vast number of interviews are being held throughout all levels of the organisation. When there is a consistency in these stories, this provides a good indicator of existing safety culture. Certification is not a guarantee, but provides a comprehensive picture of the maturity on safety awareness within the organisation.

Our opinion is that we only need a new method if it adds something new. A distinctive element of the SCL is that it is certified by independent auditors, and that fits the goal for TenneT to apply the SCL as an objective instrument in our procurement process. TenneT expects a shift in the future from the traditional management system certification to an assessment of behaviour and attitude (cultural approach). The SCL is an example of the latter.

We apply multiple ways of rewarding, we make a distinction between formal and informal rewarding. Example of formal rewarding is a good scoring via our Supplier Performance Management system. Within certain framework agreements we already use these results from Supplier Performance Management in the awarding of new tenders. Example of informal rewarding is giving publicity on safety initiatives via corporate communication means, such as website, newsletter, safety award ceremonies etc

We see the SCL as an addition to OHSAS18001 and the other way round. Where OHSAS 18001 has its basis in systems and processes, the SCL has that on the actual attitude and behavior. SCL measures the effectiveness of the management system, as it were. 

There are similarities, but both initiatives have a different focus. The SCL is not a program as such, but primarily measures the culture of an organisation. The culture can be changed by many "intervention / development" programs, like IIF for example. The IIF program could be an example of how an organisation trains its leaders, reflecting in the aspect "Leadership and Involvement", which is part of the SCL.

This heavily depends on the existing safety culture. A transition from level 2 to level 3 roughly takes in between 12 till 18 months. This heavily depends on a number of factors that influences this timeline such as the actual safety awareness, size of the organisation and the type of SCL requirement needed (full SCL certification or a SAQ+ statement (reflecting 40% of full SCL certification)) and available resources for this improvement process.